Talk:Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States

Consistency on "right of way" versus "right-of-way"
The pedants out there who read this ;-) will probably quickly notice that "right of way" is hyphenated and unhyphenated with reckless abandon. This could be made consistent, but unfortunately the underlying material is also inconsistent.  The General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875's title is hyphenated, but the Act's text uses the unhyphenated form.  The land patent in the case uses the hyphenated form.  The circuit opinion uniformly uses the hyphenated form (and not just when quoting the land patent).  The Supreme Court's opinion uses the unhyphenated form, except when quoting the circuit opinion (itself quoting the land patent) and when referring to the 1875 Act by name.  At some point you just have to throw your hands up and give up on consistency here, I think.  :-) Waldo (talk) 01:50, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20140411063550/http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20140313/WDH01/303120353/Impact-state-trails-uncertain-wake-Supreme-Court-easement-decision to http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20140313/WDH01/303120353/Impact-state-trails-uncertain-wake-Supreme-Court-easement-decision

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)