Talk:Mary, mother of James

POV tag
User:Crusadestudent: what exactly in this version of the article, which you have now tagged twice for POV,  is "lutheran"? Jytdog (talk) 22:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * My apologies; in my haste, I did not notice you had removed the Lutheran-centric material. I'll be more careful in the future.   Deus vult (aliquid)!   Crusadestudent (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary, mother of James. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151116063403/http://www.textexcavation.com/papias.html to http://www.textexcavation.com/papias.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Problematic Lightfoot citation
This article requires editing or removal of JB Lightfoot. The work is much dated. He was working from a Latin work as evidenced from his notes. Since then, we have the Greek fragments of Papias. Lightfoot was not working with the fragments but Latin translations of Papias which he believed was spurious of medieval writer by the same name. However, that is no longer the case. Lightfoot is a much dated work, 150 years old. The entry appears to indicate that Lightfoot found the Greek fragments spurious; Lightfoot was not aware of the existence of these at the time of his writing his book. Editors should take more when using date works for citations.