Talk:Mary Agnes Chase

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 September 2020 and 1 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Allisonkirkpatrick. Peer reviewers: KHuckaby1920, Sbowen99, Abomb66.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Agnes Chase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001071007/http://anthropology.si.edu/laexped/chasens.htm to http://anthropology.si.edu/laexped/chasens.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109063034/http://huntbot.andrew.cmu.edu/HIBD/Departments/Art/HitchcockChase.shtml to http://huntbot.andrew.cmu.edu/HIBD/Departments/Art/HitchcockChase.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

peeer review
Wow, this is a pretty beefy page! I like the flow and neutrality of your life and career section, but do you know anything about her earlier life? It seems to jump right into her achievements but some background may help to humanize her. Just a suggestion, this section has good flow and information. Good intro the the suffrage movement! There is a ton of information here and you sources seem good. If anything, I think adding more about her scientific accomplishments in botany may help to balance the article a bit. That being said, I think you could add some more to the lead. There is a lot about her being a suffragist and that should probably go into the lead. Your structure is clear by and large, but it sometimes feels just a little bit jumpy between paragraphs, maybe edit some transitions a little bit. Compared to how much suffragist stuff there is, maybe consider adding some more stuff to the previous section. Overall you seems to keep a neutral tone with reliable sources, great start! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abomb66 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)