Talk:Mary O'Grady

Neutrality?
It seems to me that this article does not have a NPOV. I know nothing about Mary O'Grady, but to me, this article seems very biased against her. Any thoughts? Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC) Er.. Have you actually read what she publishes? I used to work at the WSJ, met her, and read her columns for the past 8 years. They are somewhat of a mix of nutty right wing fanatic, and fairy tale history. My complaint about this Wiki entry is that it is barely anything at all. I can get more information about Britney Spears' shoe polisher than I can about this person. makes you wonder, why the secrecy and lack of information. Hmmm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.40.57.118 (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Criticism section
I rewrote the criticism section recently added to this article by User:Hanzon, as it did not comply with Wikipedia's policies on neutral point of view and biographies of living persons. All negative statements about living people must be sourced, and Wikipedia should not take positions on controversies ourselves. For example, we can say that she has been accused of making inaccurate statements in her reporting, but should not state this allegation as fact. Robofish (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * As it stands, the current criticism section is problematic. It neither sources the claims by the critics nor does it cite any reliable source saying these critics' claims are unfounded. There's just no reason to think, given what we have here, that critics don't have proof of their allegations. We'd need some RS who says that such proof has not been provided.2601:47:4200:542:CAF7:33FF:FE77:D800 (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)