Talk:Mary Surratt/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DrStrauss (talk · contribs) 18:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

On hold, see 2. b.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * See the on hold comment for 2. b.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Placing on hold due to sub-criterion b. The last paragraph of "Civil War and widowhood" could be made clearer or better in terms of inline citations.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * No issues.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No issues.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No issues.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Excellent use of images, extensive but not excessive.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold, see 2. b.
 * Let me know if the change I made is acceptable to you. MagicatthemovieS (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)