Talk:Maryland Route 194/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ebe123 (talk · contribs) 13:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No dead links;
 * No disambiguation page links;
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No dead links;
 * No disambiguation page links;
 * No dead links;
 * No disambiguation page links;

This article seems good to go, but here's some things:
 * Reference list blocked by Portal box (that should be in see also or external links)

Comments
Hold now for 7 days (would get fixed before.) Ebe 123  → report on my contribs. 13:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review, Ebe123. The portal box should not be under External links because portals are internal to Wikipedia. WP:ALSO says portal boxes are usually placed in a See also section, but it does not say they are required to be there. Likewise, Template:Portal says portal boxes are meant to be placed in a See also section, but does not say that is required. The reference list is narrowed, but it is still readable and no information is obscured. Is there an accessibility concern?  V C  16:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I suggest putting Portal bar instead. There can be accessability concerns but it's mostly for the visual aspect.   Ebe 123  → report on my contribs. 19:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * None of this is dealt with in the GA criteria, meaning that if this is the only hang up, I suggest that the article be listed and promoted.  Imzadi 1979  →   20:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll promote.  Ebe 123  → report on my contribs. 21:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)