Talk:Maryland Route 537/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I will be reviewing this article. Hello32020 (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Review Checklist

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

One of the shortest good article candidates I've seen, regardless, it appears to be comprehensive. The lead surmises the rest of the article efficiently. Both the MD 537A and D and MD 537B and C sections seem to detail their course fully and the major intersections section appears to be flawless. The history section provides a relatively detailed description for such a small highway. Additionally all of the rest of the criteria seem to be fulfilled. Good job. Hello32020 (talk) 21:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: