Talk:Maryland Route 70/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 02:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Either tonight, if I'm up to it, or tomorrow. – TC N7  JM  02:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Alright. Let's get this started.

...or not. I have read the article twice and found no errors. So...

Final verdict
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Congratulations on having the first article that I have passed without putting on hold.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Congratulations on having the first article that I have passed without putting on hold.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: