Talk:Masia (restaurant)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 02:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 02:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Great, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)



Observations

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * This paragraph is overlinked. My sense is that we may consider eliminating some of the links:

The menu, inspired by traditional Spanish cuisine and recipes from Chesa's family,[4] included mussels escabeche in vermouth, chicken and mushroom croquettes, paella, Spanish omelettes,[6] jamón ibérico, flautas, patatas bravas,[7] and churros with chocolate.[3] The bunch menu included bacon-and-egg paella,[5] churros and pastries, egg scrambles with blood sausage, tortillas españolas, and glass bread with tomato also available at Ataula.[4] Filling options for Spanish breads included tortilla española, chorizo and tomato, Mahón cheese and quince, and confit tuna and olive. Chorizo and manchego could be added to the vegan salad. The hamburger had grass-fed ground beef with piquillo peppers, havarti, date-sherry ketchup, and mussels in vermouth.[4] Jackson-Glidden described the happy hour as "vermouth-centric".[8] Masia also had a churro and a coffee counter called 180 Xurros and hosted private events.[6] The restaurateurs behind Masia had previously served Barcelona-style churros via 180 Xurros, before the business closed in 2018.[5][2]
 * Superfluous links might consider common western foods such as chicken, croquettes, chocolate, egg, blood sausage, quince, tuna and olive. We might also consider hamburger, date-sherry ketchup (since these are all individual links) and coffee. Appreciate the links, but the foodies only need to know foods not heretofore encountered.


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Good work on archiving the references!


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * A necessary inclusion is the impact of Covid-19 on other Eateries in Portland and the US.


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV is preserved.


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article created on 1 April 2021; 54 edits and 2 distinct authors.


 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Masia, PDX 4.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
 * Portland, OR (Feb. 17, 2021) - 40.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
 * Masia, PDX 3.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.


 * 1) Overall:
 * A good article, with the needful (and sad) impact of Coronavirus on the restaurant industry.
 * If we could deal with the matter of overlinking in the aforementioned paragraph, matters might proceed swiftly. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:27, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for your work! --Whiteguru (talk) 22:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)