Talk:Masonic Temple of Citrus Lodge No. 118, F. and A.M.

Question
Some masonic buildings were designed with a Masonic tenant in mind (ie there was a lodge room in the original floor plans)... in others the rooms were originally planned for other purposes, but then converted to Masonic use when the Masons moved in. Do we know which is the case here? Blueboar (talk) 01:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Concern
As the article says, Citrus lodge No. 118 moved out of the building back in the 1960s ... so technically, 301 Hendrix Ave (the lodge's current address) is "the Masonic Temple of Citrus Lodge No. 118". The building that is the subject of this article is more accurately the "Former Masonic Temple of Citrus Lodge No. 118"... I realize it is unlikely that we will ever have an article on the new building... so my concern isn't a disambiguation issue... but it would be nice to have an article title that is accurate. Perhaps one of the alternative names? Blueboar (talk) 19:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)