Talk:Mass Effect 2: Overlord/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Red Phoenix (talk · contribs) 00:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

All right, let's get started, shall we?


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I had to tweak one duplicate use of the word "pack", but otherwise the prose reads reasonably well. There are a few patches that could use a little tweaking from an experienced copyeditor for sentence fluency, but none of these are major enough to get in the way of this review.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Very nicely done with the sources. All appear to be reliable per WP:VG/S per their usages in the article, and everything appears quite well referenced.  Aesthetically, I'd double-check to make sure all references come in number order when using more than one in a sentence, but again, not in the way of this review.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Hits all the major points of a video game article: plot, gameplay, development and release, and reception. More than enough real-world content to balance off the fictional elements.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No point of view issues I can see.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Does not appear to be the subject of edit wars.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Two fair-use images. Both have good rationales and are used appropriately.  No other images are used.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well done! I'd say we have enough to pass right away.  Let me know if you have questions.

Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... 00:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * You just beat me to this one, Red Phoenix! Congrats, Niwi, on another quality contribution. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you. I wasn't expecting this review to be so good and quick. Cheers :) --Niwi3 (talk) 09:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)