Talk:Mass funding

There is an established consensus that words like Mass funding and Crowd funding should be two words. Therefore Mass-funding and Massfunding are redirected to this page Mass funding BenediktG (talk) 07:46, 07 October 2009

Mass Funding Vailidity
I'am not an expert in this area however I'm confused as to why the Mass funding article was accepted on wikipedia? There seems to be no supporting evidence of its cause. Should it then not be argued that mass funding does not have a place on wikipedia?


 * Thanks for raising this question. Please could you create an account here on Wikipedia to make your helpful additions, or at least let us know your name, so that we can address you as a person rather than just the Australian IP address that's registered here? Answering your question, Wikipedia accepts all new articles automatically and there is a process for deleting or merging them which you can find described elsewhere in the community portal. I tend to agree with you that this article belongs together with the Crowd funding article and you will find discussion on that point under Crowd funding discussion page.


 * 119.12.90.48 (who started this thread) is User:Allthingsonline (Talk). I also support the merge, as no-one's presented evidence that mass funding and crowd funding are widely acknowledged as distinct concepts.  Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 12:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Please use Talk:Crowd_funding for this discussion. :)

BenediktG(talk 15:00, 02 February 2010 (UTC)

Intention to execute merger with Crowd funding article
Unless anyone objects to the merge I will have a go at doing it in the next week or so. Hugh Mason (talk • contribs 07:20, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Hugh, if you mean massfunding will become a re-direct to crowdfunding then yes. It's confusing as to why massfunding was accepted on wikipedia. So yes proceed accordingly. Allthingsonline (talk) 10:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Please discuss this on Talk:Crowd_funding BenediktG(talk 15:11, 02 February 2010 (UTC)