Talk:Mass media in the United States/Archive 1

wow this was a bad article
i think one of the worst on wikipedia. coincidental? i think not. and where is TV?? TV isn't a media now???

Move article?
Why not move this to US media? Susan Mason

I think the larger problem is consistency with similar articles. There are: Media in Canada, Media in Poland, Belarusian media, Media of Venezuela. Also, Communications in the United Kingdom, Communications in Vietnam, Communications in Vanuatu, Communications in Uzbekistan, Communications in Yemen, etc. cover similar topics. (Just search with 'Communcations' and you will get a bunch, probably because of some public domain source was imported.)

I'm not against renaming this page, but a wider solution might be needed for this situation. Tomos 02:32 Mar 12, 2003 (UTC)

(just a note..)

Overview
 * industrial organization
 * ownership structure
 * major players
 * flows of programs/contents and money
 * major regulations

Internet
Given the point I made (Media of the United States) about links to organisations that charge to see articles, would it be useful to make a list or newspapers, etc. that charge to see their archives and those that don't? This might be handy for wikipedia editors who want to put a link in to corroborate some part of their article, but who would prefer not to use a source that charges for its material. Will also post this to Village Pump. Matt Stan 09:41, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Need comment at deletion discussion
Please see the discussion here -- this needs more input from editors who actually work in this area. Badagnani 16:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Bias?
Is it just me, or is this article lacking a NPOV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phantombantam (talk • contribs) 18:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

"Uni-ethnicity"
An interesting and almost unique feature of this industry is the "uni-ethnicity" character media ownership/management and/or control. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.65.252 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Media of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140214120404/http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php to http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071204002434/http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~rjensen/freelance/thinkingdemocracy.htm to http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~rjensen/freelance/thinkingdemocracy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Arbitron is now Nielsen Audio
I modified the last line of the "Radio" section, which relates to consumer research and ratings, to reflect the acquisition of the consumer research company Arbitron and its subsequent renaming to Nielsen Audio, a change that is noted here: Nielsen Audio. It was surprising to see this fact not yet reflected in this article, as the acquisition closed in 2013. Thank you. EvilPastaSalad (talk) 04:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

MSNBC - Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This maybe of interest to those watching this page:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding Just wanted to get some other opinions on this and have some discussion. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "MSNBC".The discussion is about the topic MSNBC. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!