Talk:Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute

Copyright Issue
I noticed that this page contains paragraphs lifted off of the link provided. I don't think that it should be deleted, but a complete rewrite is needed. I found the violation by taking two random sentences in the middle of a bigger paragraph and Googled them. I also was tipped off by the substantial headers. Contact me for any question because I am willing to work on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktr101 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 21 February 2009

Article was posted by copyright holder
This article was posted by us (the Toxics Use Reduction Institute -- the copyright holder) as part of our organization's outreach efforts. It reproduces the language on our website intentionally.

Parthena53 (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedians about to delete the article Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute, please be patient while the copyright holder finishes complying with the required procedure for allowing copyrighted text in an article.
 * Parthena53, please hurry to finish complying with the required procedure, because the Wikipedians about to delete the article might wait for only a few days.
 * If you hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License:
 * Explain this on this article's discussion page, then either display a notice to this effect at the site of original publication or send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal letter to the Wikimedia Foundation. These messages must explicitly permit use under the GFDL.
 * Note: Articles on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view and must be verifiable in published third-party sources; copyright issues aside, your text may not be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia.
 * If this text is in the public domain, or is already under a license suitable for Wikipedia:
 * Explain this on this article's discussion page, with reference to evidence.
 * -- Wavelength (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Since permission to use this text has not been verified, it has been restored to the last clean before the introduction of this text. If that permission is supplied through the processes set out at Donating copyrighted materials, it can be restored. Until there is an explicit release under GFDL at the external site or a ticket number from OTRS placed by a member of the Communications Committee, it should not be restored. Contributors are, of course, welcome to incorporate some of the material removed in their own language, so long as they do not paraphrase so closely as to result in copyright infringement. Please see our copyright policy for more details. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)