Talk:Master of Science in Health Informatics

and tags
The content and sourcing of this article are problematic, especially when it comes to passages like


 * The rapid growth and high demand for health informatics is stimulating an expansion of educational opportunities with degrees at all levels both in the United States and at international institutions.

Not only is this not saying much, the source is a position paper with the conclusion:


 * "The number and variety of these opportunities, as well as the knowledge that your work is helping people lead healthier lives, makes health informatics a very rewarding career."

Needless to say, the individual university pages don't qualify either as they're all trying to sell their curricula. (The Huang study looks like a better source.) Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 17:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I suggest AfD. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 17:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I would actually prefer trimming first, then merge + redirect to health informatics if any interesting content remains. WDYT? Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 20:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No objection. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 22:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the feedback. These are certainly valid concerns. This is my first attempt at making a Wikipedia article, which is probably obvious. After looking at the health informatics page I think there would definitely be some added value to discussing the degree in general, as well as some of Huang's points on the curriculum. Please allow me a couple days to make some changes to the article. Maybe then we can discuss the next best steps. Thanks again for your patience and understanding. MedTechStudent (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17510222/, https://web.archive.org/web/20220114222457/https://www.ihs.org.in/HealthInformatics/HealthInformatics.htm, https://web.archive.org/web/20220305193110/https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bult.2011.1720370512. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)