Talk:Matsemela Manaka

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 5 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nickywithdablicky.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
Lead: The lead was solid. It summarized what the rest of the article consisted of, while also being brief.

Sourcing: For the length of the article, it has a decent amount of sources. They consisted of reliable sources including 3 journal articles with reviews and interviews. One source was from the company that awarded the PEN Award. The last source may not be too reliable. The mission of that website is to create a positive image about South Africa, meaning this could be biased. The sources were properly cited throughout the article.

Structure: This article was very organized. The headings described what was covered in the paragraph below. My only suggestion would be to possibly make a separate heading for awards.

Language: I felt like this article was easy to read, however, some language was repetitive. The phrases "he then" and "which was" were used frequently. There were a few places where the grammar could be a little bit better. Overall, it was a good start to this article. Stacy.johnson515 (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review
by User: Okinawalover

The lead included an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead also included a brief description of the article's major sections. It is concise and not detailed. The does not lead include information that is not present in the article.
 * Lead

Your article had reliable sources that included journals, reviews, interviews, and articles. All of the sources were cited correctly.
 * Sourcing

The article was very organized. I would suggest adding his death to the lead.
 * Structure

The article was written very well and easy to read. Okinawalover (talk) 18:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Language

Peer Review
by User: Thee.Outkast

The lead is clear and gives a brief introduction to the article.
 * Lead

The article includes reliable resources such as interviews and journals.
 * Sourcing

The article is organized nicely, I also suggest adding his death to the article.
 * Structure

The article was clear and well written. Thee.outkast (talk) 05:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Language

Peer Review
Lead
 * Your lead was very formal and clearly describe what you were going to talk about in your article.

Sourcing


 * You use two reliable source to make your article notable for wikipedia.

Structure


 * You structure your paper well and organized it in section to back up your points made in your article.

Language


 * Your article was well written with no spelling erros and periods and commas are where there supposed to be . This was a good article . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subzero10 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)