Talk:Matthew 2:16

I keep removing- the deletion tag because you have no grounds to delete this page. Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia. freestylefrappe 04:38, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree that there's no reason for this page to be deleted, but the proper thing to do is to vote Keep at the votes for deletion page not to remove the tag- we have to follow the rules! --G Rutter 13:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Crotalus_horridus, crotalus has a history of incorrectly using vfd. freestylefrappe 21:56, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Whatever we think, we have to follow the rules! If there is a problem with a user, then the best thing to do is to have a look at the "How to resolve conflicts" section on Community Portal. --G Rutter 07:20, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Gundry work referenced in last paragraph?
Is this the Gundry work referenced in the last paragraph? If so, then please copy this to the article's references section. I took this reference from other Matthew, Chapter 2 verses that had references to Gundry, but I don't know that it is the applicable work.


 * Gundry, Robert H. Matthew a Commentary on his Literary and Theological Art. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982.

Thanks. --Unfocused 18:57, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

VfD
On May 21, this article was nominated for deletion. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matthew 2:16. The result was keep. &mdash; Xezbeth 06:47, May 28, 2005 (UTC)