Talk:Matthew 2:23

Isaiah 11:1
Jerome and the Catholic Encyclopedia both explicitly associate Matthew 2:23 with the reference to 'sprout' at Isaiah 11:1, yet that verse is not mentioned at all in this article. Is there a good reason for this?-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 14:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

(I have added these details.)-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew 2:23. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060509013242/http://www.columbia.edu/~rcc20/christianity/galilee.html to http://www.columbia.edu/~rcc20/christianity/galilee.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

The structure of the end of this sentence seems unclear to me: "Matthew gives no specific reason for why the family moved to this town except for the prophecy fulfillment and does not show any knowledge that Luke has them originally from there." I'm unsure what the phrase "that Luke has them originally from there" means, it feels like it's missing a particle or something. It sounds like a colloquial way of saying "that Luke describes them as being originally from there" but as someone who is not knowledgeable on this subject I don't want to edit it in case that's not correct. I at least find this phrasing unintuitive so I'm wondering if anybody who knows has a better way to put whatever it's trying to say. Illdie (talk) 19:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)