Talk:Matthew Tye

Neutrality
Note that the neutrality of this article has been questions on this AfD page. Shritwod (talk) 21:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * As I wrote in the AfD: "I wrote all of the text in the current version of the article. I did not write the article to "praise its subject". I wrote the article to "describe him" based on all the reliable sources that covered him. Editors who have raised Neutral point of view concerns have not pointed out which paragraphs, sentences, or phrases are non-neutral. I recommend that editors who consider the article to be non-neutral open a discussion on the article's talk page with specific examples of what is non-neutral and what can be improved. I am open to discussing on the article's talk page whether any content needs to be reworded or whether any content does not comply with Neutral point of view." From Template:POV, "You may remove this template whenever any one of the following is true" including "It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given." You added a POV template to the article but have not pointed out which paragraphs, sentences, or phrases are non-neutral. Please do so. Cunard (talk) 21:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note to Shritwod: it appears that a lack of response here has resulted in your neutrality template being removed. The AfD has been closed as "keep". BlueMoonset (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Noteworthy?
This seems to be self-promotion for a YouTube channel. There are almost no citations relevant to this long-winded adventure story, and I have to wonder what it's doing on Wiki. This guy is unknown. 109.148.131.232 (talk) 06:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree. This article really does have a concerning amount of biased sources, presented with affirmations of the following sort - [The company ceased communication after Tye and Sterzel requested sources to validate the company's incorrect assertions] - with "incorrect assertions" being an example of a reckless statement, which goes against rule 9 of Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia: Write neutrally and with due weight. So, said this, I believe this page to be somewhat compromised. 2804:214:8905:1D5:178D:2ABA:2F6D:1698 (talk) 01:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * He does have some articles from reliable news sources on the page, as well as two documentaries that he produced and starred in. We should probably seek to remove the bloat as it does read like self promotion and an adventure story. But he is notable enough for a page. OnceAdream93 (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)