Talk:Maureen A. Donnelly

CSD
Have put in for a speedy deletion request per G5. , am removing request deletion tag as speedy per G5 better applies. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I've declined the request as notability is clear and the sourcing adequate. Our practice is that deleting a G5 is not necessary if an established editor takes responsibility, which I am doing.  DGG ( talk ) 01:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * DGG, Softlavender, what makes this prof notable--- the publicaitons list? I can find basically nothing in Google books, Google news and regular search. My nomination of this article was not in bad faith-- it was because I could not find regular sources to establish notability. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 02:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * HVE, it's obvious you are targeting Fouette's articles. That's very bad form. Especially for a PROD, because it would have been automatically deleted after a week if not removed. Move on, stay away from Fouette's articles. Softlavender (talk) 02:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I had a serious quesiton about why this person qualifies for notability. You can answer and help me understand, or not, but save the accusations for someone else. So, is it the publications list, going by WP:Acdemic? Which point of WP: ACADEMIC? You are noth more expereinced than I am and you both think she is notable, so I have a good faith question as to why. Knowing the answer will give me better skills at assessing articles. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)