Talk:Maus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 20:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

I look forward to reviewing this article. I would like to alert contributing editors that checklinks found a broken link in the article. Please address this in the meantime while I complete the review. Thanks! -- Tea with toast  (話)  20:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking the time to do this. I've fixed the broken link issue by finding another source—the source I was using seems to have vanished from Google's memory...  C üRly T üRkey  Talk Contribs 21:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Final Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * --Excellent job with all the sources. I appreciate the citation style you have used.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * --Great job bringing in images from other related topics to help dress the article up.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * --This is an impressive and well crafted article. I can see that I lot of hard work went into detailing the background information and sources. I can't think of much that is left to do to improve the article. Great job! -- Tea with toast  (話)  23:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * --Great job bringing in images from other related topics to help dress the article up.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * --This is an impressive and well crafted article. I can see that I lot of hard work went into detailing the background information and sources. I can't think of much that is left to do to improve the article. Great job! -- Tea with toast  (話)  23:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * --This is an impressive and well crafted article. I can see that I lot of hard work went into detailing the background information and sources. I can't think of much that is left to do to improve the article. Great job! -- Tea with toast  (話)  23:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)