Talk:Mausoleum of Yugoslav Soldiers in Olomouc

Article issues including class assessment

 * The article only has 4 references. In the section Characteristics (that could be architecture) there is content; "A two-branch staircase leads to the chapel entrance behind 12 Doric columns standing in three rows.". According to the picture on the article and other images, there appears to be only 10 columns. Some images show parts of the interior between the columns and I have not seen any that are hidden.


 * The reference (translated) does not mention 12 columns, with "Mauzoleum Yugoslav soldiers located in the Bezruč Park in Manchester. About 11 m high with chapel dome and Doric columns, laying of the hill behind the ossuary.". The link "Jugoslávské mauzoleum čeká obnova", returns


 * "Stránka neexistuje Chyba 404" or "page does not exist Error 404". None of the references I have been able to find specifically enumerates 12. All of the images I have found shows two rows of outside columns of 4 and two in the front. The reference Černoušek, Tomáš; Pavel Zatloukal; Vladimír Šlapeta. Olomoucká architektura 1900-1950: Průvodce (in Czech) does not give a page number and is broad "Olomouc architecture 1900-1950", not pointing to the subject.


 * I realize that if only four references can be found, and these are reliable and cover the subject, then that is the best we can do. However, with only three references, a dead link and not a lot of content, considering 7 projects cover the subject, I wonder about elevating an article such as this to "B-class" yet all 7 projects have done this.


 * "IF" we are involved in projects keeping up with the Jones we are seriously undermining the purposes and intent of placing classes on articles. If this was done by a bot then there should be serious issues with such "classification matching". I have no intent in a word battle or any editing attempts, simply looked at the article including references. I hope others can consider that the purpose of classing articles is for article as well as encyclopedia improvements. It is a stretch to place this article in "C-class", let alone "B", and we should not want to just make Wikipedia statistics look better. Otr500 (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for raising these issues. I am planning to work on the article, but the mausoleum is being renovated at the moment and so I am waiting until the work is finished because some more articles about the monument will surely appear in the press then. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Exellent: Good luck with things and I hope you can solve the "hidden columns" issue. Otr500 (talk) 04:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)