Talk:Maw sit sit

This was referenced from http://www.gemselect.com/other-info/about-maw-sit-sit.php. However, User:Vsmith say's that this source is not reliable. If anyone thinks differently, please do credit the source appropriately.Dyml (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm trying to find better sources. One question for the original author: The article says that it has an RI index ranging from 1.52 to 1.74. I've found a source saying that the RI ranges from 1.52-4.  That's a big difference. I'm going to go with what the source tells me, but if there is conflicting information with a credible source, then don't hesitate to present it. Keihatsu (talk) 07:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I did find another source for refractive index: http://www.gemologyonline.com/mawsitsit.html and http://gemologyproject.com/wiki/index.php?title=Maw-sit-sit. It also states 1.52-1.74. I'll let you confirm which is most reliable. Thanks for the edits, the page looks good.Dyml (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

This rock is ridiculous
Wow 2600:6C50:147F:FABE:1D75:A6AE:7844:2867 (talk) 00:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)