Talk:Max Frisch

Clarification
He was "one of the most representative writers of German literature after World War II" despite being Swiss and living in Switzerland his entire life? --NEMT 15:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

In reply to the above: 'German literature' is probably meaning literature written in the German language, rather than that which belongs to Germany. Could be clarified though.

Article Quality
This article is poorly written and contains several grammatical mistakes. The content is also weak. Much of Max Frisch's life is left out and some of his important works are not mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.148.43 (talk) 03:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem
This article has been reverted by a bot to as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Film versions of his work
At least one of his novels (Homo Faber) was made into a movie. It is common on Wik for this sort of information to be mentioned. I don't know what others were filmed, so I haven't added anything. Kdammers (talk) 10:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

"though these pieces are all now for the most part forgotten"
This sentence is confusing.

"The piece unleashed public discussion of the issues involved, and can today be compared with Friedrich Dürrenmatt's The Physicists (1962) and Heinar Kipphardt's On the J Robert Oppenheimer Affair (In der Sache J. Robert Oppenheimer), though these pieces are all now for the most part forgotten."

Surely "though these pieces are all now for the most part forgotten" refers to the plays written by Max Frisch, not Friederich Dürrenmatt's Die Physiker. Dürrenmatt's play is still very well known.

Please clarify

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Frisch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303184127/http://www.mfa.ethz.ch/en/max-frisch/awards/1958_charles_veillon.html to http://www.mfa.ethz.ch/en/max-Frisch/awards/1958_charles_veillon.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)