Talk:Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon

Production section
Seems to me the article by Mike Leeder at ImpactOnline is not a reliable source seeing as Leeder is a producer (therefore essentially an employee) for Albert Pyun. While ImpactOnline may or may not be a reliable source, an interview/article written by Leeder re: Pyun most certainly has bias and point-of-view problems. Sprinkler21 (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21
 * Answered on your talk page. Daß Wölf (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I'll write down here things I'd like to change so that we don't waste time reverting and re-editing each other:
 * The Settlement section should not be a level-1 section. It should be a part of Controversy or just merged into Controversy altogether. We could also merge Settlement, then re-arrange the sentences so that Controversy gets a Lawsuits subsection.
 * The Release section should arguably be before the Controversy section, as it chronologically and causally precedes it. No loans were defaulted on before the film had a chance to flop in the box office. There is also a weak case to be made for the Reception section to be moved between Release and Controversy, as is customarily done.
 * We could use the source you linked for the film gross, although it would be nice to find a better source, since we'd have to write "according to GEDCA".
 * The Sequel section is probably too short to survive by itself, but I can't think of a good section to merge it into. Daß Wölf (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna be buried with life for awhile and won't be able to work on stuff around here for several days. I'm ok with every suggestion above except the last: I'm really curious as to why there would be a sequels section at all. It's mentioned the film had a sequel in the first paragraph and there's a link, why clutter what's turning out to be a great article with details about a sequel? I'll try to get back to some of the gnome work here when I can. I really do appreciate your help on this. It's looking great. Sprinkler21 (talk) 22:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21
 * I'm pretty busy too at the moment, so sorry for not doing much with the article. I've shortened the part about the sequel and merged it into the Release section. Per WP:LEAD, "Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." The sequel is certainly notable in the context of Curse of the Dragon, as it features the same leading actor playing the same role in much of the same way as the first movie, and they were released as a double feature multiple times (I've mentioned one, since it would probably be overkill to list every DVD and Blu-ray version ever sold). Therefore I think it deserves to be mentioned in the article. Daß Wölf (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I see your point. Changes look great. It's lookin' like a GA for sure. I'll continue working on it when I can. Sprinkler21 (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21
 * Thanks, and thanks again for all your hard work on the article :) Daß Wölf (talk) 22:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Archived old threads
GA Reviewer here -- I've archived some old threads on this talk page so as to help better assess stability and look at only current ongoing issues at present.

Metric used was archived threads older and with zero activity or new responses for over one (1) year.

They may now be seen in the link at the talk header at the top of this page.

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 11:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Off-talk page discussion
Here is a discussion tangential to the article. Daß Wölf (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)