Talk:Max Mosley/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I will review this article. I have familiarized myself with its recent GAR discussion. Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 18:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

First Review by Robert Skyhawk
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Again, this article definitely meets the criteria in my opinion. The issue about the Nazi organization which was raised during its reassessment seems to be resolved. Congratulations to User:4u1e and all other involved editors. I will now proceed to take all necessary steps to award this article GA status. Thanks, Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 20:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Many have contributed, but Tommy turrell is the other major contributor. Thanks for taking the time to do the review. 4u1e (talk) 20:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)