Talk:Maxim Lapierre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

I've done a quick read of the article and checked for dead links. Everything is looking very good so far. I'm going to spot check some of the references and do a double check of grammar, but this article will probably be a quick pass.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Changed game-winner to game-winning goal more clarification for people who may not be familiar ice hockey. It also sounded more encyclopedic to me.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * no dead links spot checks of refs provided accuracy
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images contain proper licensing. The two images from flickr have been verified.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * All images contain proper licensing. The two images from flickr have been verified.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I didn't find any major issues with this article so I've gone ahead and passed this. Great work.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 00:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)