Talk:Maximum sustained wind/GA2

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Maximum sustained wind/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

An attempt was made to resolve the issues raised by the previous reviewer, so the article has been renominated. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

I read closely, and I can find nothing that could restrict the article from reaching GA status. Although the article is a little short, I'm surprised at how much information you found on the subject. It passes. Congrats! Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  14:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: