Talk:Maximum tolerable period of disruption

Small improvements done to this article
Hi all, I added two synonims for MTPOD that share the acronym "MAO". Also tweaked a bit the article, but it would certainly benefit from a major revamp! I'll try to make time in the next couple weeks to improve it, help will be much appreciated. Regards, DPdH (talk) 12:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maximum tolerable period of disruption. Please take a moment to review my edit. ✅ If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090717220729/http://e-janco.com/MaximumTolerablePeriodofDisruption%20.html to http://e-janco.com/MaximumTolerablePeriodofDisruption%20.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

To Do list
Here is my proposed list of things to address to improve the quality of this article. I will check these off as done as I complete them. Feel free to expand the list or contribute. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Process for determination

 * Revise content to improve quality by naming processes from a variety of authoritative standards. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Include discussion of Recovery time objective (RTO) and Work Recovery Time (WRT) as necessary factors for calculating MDT / MTO. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 19:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Image

 * Obtain a higher quality image(s).
 * Verify that the included diagrams match authoritative definitions.
 * Display multiple images if processes described by authoritative standards differ. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Categories

 * Add to categories reflecting relevance to information security, information technology, business continuity.
 * Adjust category reflecting article quality rating if inappropriate. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality rating

 * Verify existing claim of C-Class quality was obtained through proper process. ✅}
 * Was the quality of this article rated using the official process? At first glance I doubt it. The article looked like a stub when I first viewed it today and that is not flaming or bashing.
 * I see that the original author of this article rated it himself immediately after its creation. I am removing the importance and quality rating with the intent of submitting to independent reviewer / committee after updates.Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Submit for quality review after completion of To Do list. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)