Talk:May Childs Nerney/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 19:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyvio/Plagiarism check - all good. I reviewed matches above 5% on Earwig's Copyvio Detector and the only matches were titles etc.

Images - Image used is appropriate and appears to be legitimately public domain.

Early life
 * "Nerney received degrees from Cornell University in 1902 and,[2] three years later," - I'd suggest moving the cite, to something like "Nerney received degrees from Cornell University in 1902,[2] and, three years later," as source 2 is supporting the 1902 not the "and"; or just move the cite next to 3 and 4, maybe employing a WP:CITEBUNDLE.
 * moved as per the first suggestion


 * I'm not sure how long a source can be before page refs should be provided, so I'll say optionally you could add the page ref (p.83) for the Hansen source.
 * Oh yeah, I should. Added. I saw a discussion on WT:FAC that >10 is a pretty good guideline

NAACP involvement
 * You could wikilink intellectual
 * sure


 * Although Rudwick and Meier are both wikilinked, you could consider a brief introduction for them, something like "In 1967, historians Elliott Rudwick and August Meier ..."
 * Done


 * "She personally traveled around the country" - I don't have access to the source, is there any more detail available, e.g. something that helps quantify this?
 * Unfortunately, no


 * I note that MOS:PEOPLANG says "there is no consensus against what is sometimes perceived as inconsistency in the same article (Black but white)"
 * I've used the style I've seen increasingly common lately but am not wedded to it.

Thomas Edison
 * "At 334 pages, Nerney wrote it because she did not think an adequate biography of Edison had been written." - doesn't quite read right to me.
 * It's, I think a, consequence of over-eager paraphrasing. Rephrased


 * Add a comma after "Nerney had interviewed Edison for the book", or do something else to meet MOS:CITEPUNCT for ref 28.
 * Comma added

Breadth and depth are appropriate, based on what I've seen in sources. I couldn't access all sources used, but did some spot checks on those I could and found no issues. NPOV maintained.

I don't have much to say here, except good work,, and many thanks to for the pre-review. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks @BennyOnTheLoose, what do you think now? Eddie891 Talk Work 20:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . Happy to pass this for GA now. (I just ran a script for dashes, as I'd forgotten to check those.) Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)