Talk:Maywood, California/Archive 1

September 2006
The controversy section needs to be reworked. It is extremely poorly written. --Kevin W. 16:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Not only is it poorly written, there are no reliable sources for what the editors claimed. Most news networks just mentioned the part about the mexican flag in a quick 12 sec sound byte and made no mention of who provoked who, cars getting vandalized, or other weird stories. BTW for future editors: conspiracy websites are not reliable sources.Mosquito-001 19:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I've removed the entire section as this is suppose to be an article about a location. Furthermore it is an example of recentism.--Jersey Devil 09:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Seal maywood ca.png
Image:Seal maywood ca.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)