Talk:Mazda MX-30

Hybrid variant?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought I read about a hybrid variant only for Japan? I couldn't find it in the article anywhere, and I think it might be important. Sagquattro2009 (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Less distractions?
I don't get the message, what's more distractive in the images you replaced. I see more or less the same background. Could you please explain? I don't see any improvement.--Alexander-93 (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I intentionally avoided your question because I think it obvious what the reason why I replaced it. What I'm not impressed with is you reverting the last edit simply because I didn't respond. Just because no one got back to you. You have a terrible habit of self-inserting your own photos in every Wikipedia page out there (I admit I formally did the same myself) but it just ain't worth it, if the picture on the Lithuania version of this article or any car article doesn't have the up-to-date picture so be it, let the native users add it in their own time or not at all. I don't go around muddling your car articles over at the German Wikipedia. I personally think it not anyone's business what should be on what foreign Wiki and should stick to their main one (wink wink, nudge nudge). --Vauxford (talk) 18:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

And now we should stick to the topic: I did not even insert the image here. I only recognized your edit and I don't see the distractions you mentioned. That's the reason, why I was asking! So could you please explain?--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned here, I don't see the English Wikipedia as foreign. I'm also able to speak and write English and I'm using it a lot for getting information. So why shouldn't I edit here? You are also welcome to add constructive content to the German Wikipedia. But in the past you didn't do and you were rebuked - by many German users. And then you stopped working there. That's not my fault.


 * For starters, it looked like it came straight off the boat, very noisy and washed out, both pictures has distraction behind them however, the one I took seems less chaotic and look more presentable. --Vauxford (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

But nevertheless I see more distractions in your image (reflections on the hood, slightly tilted vehicle, price tag in the red car, advertisement at the store window, visible COVID-rules in the showroom). And that's why I'm going to ask for a third opinion.--Alexander-93 (talk) 19:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for your answer. You're right, the picture is too noisy. I somehow deactivated the noise reduction by revising the image after someone edited the jpeg. I uploaded the picture again a few minutes ago.

Third opinion
There is a disagreement about the images listed below. Two were replaced with two others at the end of February. I think the replacement was not necessary and to avoid an edit-war, I'm asking for a third opinion. All images are not perfect and have some distractions: The arguments against the replaced pictures: more noisy, washed out, uncalm background. The arguments against the current pictures: reflections on the hood with an uneven color gradient, slightly tilted vehicle, price tag in the red car, advertisement at the store window, visible COVID-rules in the showroom. Thanks in advance. P.S. Please feel free to add more arguments.--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The tilted angle is correct right angle since there a slight incline, and the "COVID-rules in the showroom"? I didn't even noticed it until I looked really hard. --Vauxford (talk) 20:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * In case of the Q3 firstly you replaced the image of the grey vehicle. And after a discussion, it resulted in keeping it! So please don't twist the truth. And as you mentioned this is off-topic and enclosed.--Alexander-93 (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm not twisting the truth here. I'm just pointing out how people keep changing their minds of what photo deemed good or not. I admit the discussion started because I replaced the photos but there was other tension following that. To be honest I think you are just grasping straws of why the one on there should be replaced. You pointing at the smallest of details (the COVID sign and the dirt or not dirt on the roof) These are extremely hard to notice and you are trying to justified why yours is better. What I pointed out is far more obvious and people can actually see it. --Vauxford (talk) 15:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I accept, if the majority prefers your images. And I find almost all arguments listed here comprehensible. But the way you are defending your images over everything is annoying. And that's the reason why I mentioned the stains on the roof. And every time I try to solve a disagreement with you, it's ending like this. I don't want to say more here, since it isn't part of this talk page.--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)