Talk:McBoyle v. United States

[Incorrect interpretation]
This was found at the bottom of the article page [in all-caps]:

The given interpretation of this decision is incorrect. The court reversed the decision of the lower courts claiming, in the quote above, that if legislators want to make an impact with their laws then they need to make their statues more specific. Holmes claims that because the statue explicitly talks about those vehicles secured to the ground that airplanes are not included in this statute.
 * Umm, I'm unable to determine what exactly in the article you are disputing! It sounds like you're agreeing with the article yet saying it's wrong. Maybe you're saying that the article is not complete? Sure, that's what the "this is a stub" means. I can find every fact mentioned in the article in the decision (at, e.g., ) so I'm removing the disputed tag. Derobert 15:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on McBoyle v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051022020759/http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/mcboyle.htm to http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/mcboyle.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)