Talk:McCloud, California

Politics and Neutrality
I think there's a problem with the neutrality in the section talking about Nestle and the water bottling issue. Two different web pages are listed inline in the article for groups in opposition to the bottling plant (or aspects thereof) but counterpoint sources are not listed, and the language and citations are a bit too selective and/or negative. There need to be some more referenced facts, so they may speak for themselves, but in their absence the section is left skewed. Insering POV-Section tag, 3/28/09. -:-  Alpin  Wolf   -:- 06:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Update of info to include Nestle bailing out. Original poster of this segment has only ever contributed this exact segment to all of Wikipedia.  Given the one-sided tone of the original inclusion that user may have had a non-neutral POV, if not an agenda.  Rewrote the section a tad for more balance, but it may not belong here at all. -:-   Alpin  Wolf   -:- 14:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I believe it does belong in this article. I find counter evidence of what you have identified as POV here: Nestlé's side of the argument advertised here: http://www.nestlewatersca.com/sacramento/ and written about here: http://www.mtshastanews.com/news/x810459941/McCloud-rifts-over-Nestle-passionate-deep-angry
 * Peace, rkmlai (talk) 11:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Notable people
I put in a person who actually has a WP article and removed the three entries that didn't. They didn't just not have an article, but were unreferenced also. No proof of notability....William 21:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)