Talk:McDonald's Chicago Flagship/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Fine, I made a few tweaks for clarity
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ok, I added subscription required to the Proquest cites
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I would suggest that there are two many images, but I will not de-list it on that basis.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy for this article to keep its GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy for this article to keep its GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)