Talk:McGill University/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. So I will be assessing the article.Pyrotec (talk)16:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Reassessment
An authoritative, well-written, well-illustrated, well-referenced article, that is compliant with the requirements of Good article criteria. I recommend that it should retain it's GA-status.

Interestingly it has some 176 in-line citations and one {citation needed} flag: efforts should be made to address this 'defect' immediately.Pyrotec (talk) 16:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)