Talk:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Babegriev (talk · contribs) 08:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

Review Results
Additional Comments : This is a really good article and, holistically speaking, deserves GA status. Once corrected, this will be a beneficial addition to the GA list.


 * Thank you for taking the time to review this article. In response to your notes on 2b, I made this change which cites the case's syllabus/headnote at page 335 as you suggested for the vote tally and list of case opinions. Regarding MOS:LEADCITE, as you mentioned, the guideline does not require inline citations to be present in the lead section in every article, and in this case I don't think they are necessary. I don't think anything in the lead section is all that controversial, since they are verifiable in the body, and other GA-class articles about Supreme Court cases have historically not needed inline citations in the lead, e.g. Lafler v. Cooper and Plumhoff v. Rickard. Please let me know if you have any additional concerns, and I would be happy to respond. Again, thanks. Mz7 (talk) 04:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Updated Review After Hold

 * Thanks again for your review! Mz7 (talk) 04:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)