Talk:McStay family murders

outdated
Why is this article tagged as outdated? Manytexts (talk) 23:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Narrative issues
Opening narrative ends with the discovery of the family vehicle, then the next section is an unnecessarily detailed ramble about what appears to be an incoherent conspiracy theory. I have no real objection to that staying, but the discovery of the bodies and the subsequent arrest and prosecutorial theorizing should be presented before any airing of "alternative" narratives, especially when those are given so much space. Kremlintroll (talk) 06:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Daily Mail
Per WP:DAILYMAIL I have removed three things sourced only to the Daily Mail, which is an unreliable source we are strongly discouraged from using. One was speculation and two were reported accusations/insinuations. I summarized the second accusation/insinuation since a response to it is cited from a reliable source. This is the removal edit; if better sources can be found, others may wish to reinstate some of the material, although I suspect it will seem less important once there are reports on the trial and its outcome. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2018 (UTC) ... And I made a further removal here after a bot rescued a Mail citation I had not noticed was used elsewhere in the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC) ... and again. With the last edit I added a "citation needed" for unconfirmed sightings. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)