Talk:Meaning (existential)

Bias removal from Sartre section
I removed the following sentence that shows bias: "For this reason Sartre's philosophy provides no assistance." .`^) Painediss`cuss (^`.  20:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

MY COMMENT IS  THAT AFTER  READING FOR  HOURS NO ONE  CAN GIVE  A STRAIGHFORWARD DEFINITION ON AN EXISTANTIOLIST.PLEASE  DEFINE IT CLEARLY AND  BRIEFLY AND  THEN ELABORATE TO YOUR  HEART'S DESIRE FOR  AS  LONG  AS  YOU WISH  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaghenag (talk • contribs) 02:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Your cognitive dissonance is stunning. The very article and viewpoint you are defending against “bias”, states very clearly that, and why, there is no such thing as “unbiased” or “objective” viewpoints or statements. Not only is it a physically and sensory impossibility to do such a thing; no, our brain is literally a bias machine whose whole modus operandi is biasing. It is only sheer arrogance, egocentricity, and shocking uneducatedness (or even stupidity) that causes you to, out of all Planck events in all of the universe, pick your own as the absolute and universal correct one. Even though you probably wouldn’t have the same viewpoint, were you shifted or rotated one single Planck length or Planck time unit to the side of your space-time position anywhere in your line of existence. Which makes it glaringly clear, why you are having such trouble with what you expressed in your comment. All I can tell you is, that without leaving that false socially conditioned and unscientific concept of “absolute unbiased truth” behind, you will forever be stuck on your current level of mental development. I know it’s painful… if done wrong… but I’m sure you will find a way that allows you to keep your self-respect. Provided you can still think for yourself too. — 89.0.243.93 (talk) 01:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Marking sources
This article does not mark sources well. There are some citations, but it is not clear what claims they are sources for. There is a quote from Kierkegaard, but the only inline citation to any work by him is not presented in the context of the quote, causing one to wonder where this quote is from. Also, this article has severa statements that seem dubious in the sense, that I find it hard to believe that they can be backed up with any source, but they still claim to be from some source. I checked the only one that was available online, and it did not support any of the claims that the citation marks. Tpylkkö (talk) 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Meaning (existential). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090324160012/http://www.logotherapyinstitute.org:80/tenets.html to http://www.logotherapyinstitute.org/tenets.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Worth of life
What is meant by meaning is worth of life???? Soumyajit basu chowdhury (talk) 16:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)