Talk:Mebeverine

Note
Having tried every imaginable drug/supplement for IBS, largely in vain, I have found mebeverine (a.k.a. Colofac IBS, available only online from the UK) to be a godsend, taken as 1 tablet 20 minutes before each meal. It is also crucial to google the IBS diet and try to identify one's personal trigger foods. Finally, soluble fiber in the form of FOODS, not fiber supplements, is at least as important as the drug. Meditrix (talk) 22:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Abbott Laboratories
Please accept the edits to this page (February 14, 2013). My name is Scott Stoffel, and I work at Abbott Laboratories in Corporate Public Affairs, and the edits I am providing are all factual, based upon review of the page with Abbott Laboratories scientists who have expertise in this area. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to access my contact information, found here: http://abbott.com/news-media/contacts.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottStoffelAbbott (talk • contribs) 18:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Anticholinergic side-effects
If it is antimuscarinic, can we say it is 'without anticholinergic side-effects' as it stands in the article? 77.93.29.14 (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Condensing
User:Karol Langner about this. I agree that this article probably doesn't need any sections at all. I feel that people generally overuse sectioning. But to the extent that we are using them, this should follow the structure described for drugs in WP:MEDMOS. I often collapse brief articles like this but people end up putting the sections back, so I generally don't fuss over it. Jytdog (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Got it, Jytdog. I don't have strong feelings about sections, but my edit improved (I believe) more than just sectioning. Karol (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I think this article would be better with no sections. It is brief enough.  I doubt this would be sustained though -- people will come back and start adding them in again.  We can try it if you like but we shouldn't raise  a ruckus if people restore them....Jytdog (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Like I said, I don't have strong feelings about the sections, my point was that I improved the wording (in my mind) a lot, and the text read much better after my edit. Jytdog, if you restore my version, I can shorten the intro or get rid of all sections, whichever you think makes more sense. Either way, this was just a drive-by edit, I actually got here via the 'random article' link :D Karol (talk) 11:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)