Talk:Mechanism of action of aspirin

Do we really want the history repeated again here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waster (talk • contribs) 19:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Repetition of history
What do you mean by the "history repeated again here"? I think its good to have the relevant part of this History of Aspirin article - that is, the part of it that pertains to the discovery of aspirin's mechanism of action- in the article. CrazyChemGuy (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Combine
This article should be combined with the main article, as much is duplicated in both. Having this separate article does a disservice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.69.248.199 (talk) 06:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Who hasn't taken an aspirin at least once?
Where is the support for Aspirin's "irreversible inactivation of the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme?" Because now I am very afraid. Tom Schmal (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Ask addition of concepts
I'd suggest that the concepts and conclusions of Patrono & Rocca, from Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. should probably be added, updating from 2007 from other sources. See here, for an example e-source. 50.153.156.88 (talk) 21:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd also note that the History section has two long paragraphs on aspirin history that repeat content from elsewhere in the encyclopedia, but only one sentence on discovery history relevant to the title subject (i.e., on disc. hist. mechanism of action of aspirin), the closing sentence of Para. 2. 50.153.156.88 (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jeffies citation incompleteness rectified, and this portion of article tag removed. 50.153.156.88 (talk) 22:29, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Writing Science 2023
— Assignment last updated by Strudel3 (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)