Talk:Mediaset/Archive 1

Google Lawsuit
"Shortly after, Claudio of byoblu.com accused Mediaset of hypocrosy, pointing out that both television and media, controlled by the Berlusconi family, regularly used YouTube videos without permission themselves, and he showed one example where Corriere della Sera had used a clip of "Christian the lion - Full ending" from the charity bornfreefoundation in one of its own videos, edited and preceded with a fee-paying advertisement".

I don't understand this paragraph. First, who is "Claudio of byoblu.com"? Second, Corriere della Sera is not a media owned by the Berlusconi family or raleted to them, as you can read on the voices Corriere della Sera and RCS MediaGroup. And finally, what's the point? Really "someone accused Mediaset of hypocrisy" deserve a voice? I think it should be better explained or removed. 62.101.65.17 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 00:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC).

Politics
"Berlusconi often uses the Italian television networks owned by the company for his own political interests, as was apparent in the elections of April 2006 where he tried to use his connections to host an unplanned debate between himself and Romano Prodi with an unsuccessful attempt to broadcast the whole time of the debate with just him in clear violation of election laws."

I believe this part of the article does not conform to a neutral point of view. It should either be removed or supported through an external source (that is not directly or indirectly tied to one of the current Italian governing parties).

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.140.22.69 (talk) 2006-08-01T17:01:36 (who also overwrote the initial edit from User:87.11.173.16 on 2006-06-09T08:57:00 !) -84user (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

- I believe it is 100pc accurate going on BBC's profile of the media (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/country_profiles/1065345.stm#media) 80.229.154.106 (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

- I instead beleave the BBC's profile is far from being NPOV: It's a undistinguishible mixture of facts and personal opinion of the BBC journalist who wrote it, along with a good set of stereotype. Certainly not a good source.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.96.3.241 (talk) 2008-08-18T16:16:46 (UTC) -84user (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Confusing Fake News Section
What are the stories and the basis behind the fake news released by Mediaset? I think you're just saying about something that "this is that" without detail and any proof. Offended? Feel free to say your complaint on my talk page. -Pika ten10 (talk) 13:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Please sign your posts...
There are three of you who edited here. Please sign your posts so that other editors will know who posted that message. That is one of talk page's central rules. -Pika ten10 (talk) 13:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree with Pika ten10. I have retrospectively added unsignedIP templates to the edits to help clarify who said what. Furthermore, please add new edits to the end of the Talk page. Yet furthermore, please do not remove other poster's comments. Please read the Talk page guidelines. My next edit will move the Geography post to the end. -84user (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Geograpy
"Due to its close proximity, Malta, an island off of Sicily also receives broadcasts." Please be informed that unlike Malta, Sicily is part of Italy as well as Sardinia. Both these islands receive Mediaset as wall as RAI as well of all TIM broadcast. So I don't see any value in putting Sicily in evidencs.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.225.160.13 (talk) 2008-08-18T13:02:06 (UTC) -84user (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC) ( moved top-posting edit to here-84user (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC) )

Wrong Assertions on interferences
"Since Italy does not respect international rules (defined by ITU) for use of frequencies these broadcasts in border areas also cause interference to foreign TV channels.[citation needed]" That's wrong. Interferences at borders are true in both directions and are not due to the ITU regulation but o the fact that there are ITU channels that are designed for National plans that can be used by both the bordering nations. This doesn't ave anything about ITU, but requires bilateral agreements on how to manage the borders. What Italy and Switzerland and France have, but Italy and Malta don't. In any case saying Mediaset interfer foreign country broadcast is pow, since also foreign coutnry interfer Mediaset. And - in general - this is a problem all Europe has, since every country has its own local plan, not Italy as a "special case". So I removed the sentence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.96.3.242 (talk) 12:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

embassy of piracy
Embassy of piracy made a reference to it in one of its videos ... http://embassyofpiracy.org/2009/05/kopimi-tvs03e01swaggerliekus/ Kushal (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

What's new in saying pirates don't like broadcasters? Come on... a blog spot is not a reference for an enciclopedia... Keith 64 (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Segrate ?!
Although it is true that Segrate was where Telemilano started, today's Mediaset production center in in Cologno Monzese. --Keith 64 (talk) 12:42, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually it has three production centres: Cologno Monzese, Segrate and Rome (see here). I've reworded to mention them all. Gr1st (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Obsolete logo
The logo is obsolete, refresh it! --IlSignoreDeiPC (talk) 13:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)