Talk:Medical photography

Medical Photography
This article references each fact appropriately and uses mostly reliable sources. It has an detailed resource list, all ranging from encyclopedias, atlases, and medical journals. There are a few resources that are just website URLs. This just not give the impression of reliable and justifiable sources. For the topic of medical photography, this article does a good job of introducing the subject, the history of the topic, and how to become one. One section that that distracted the readers was the consent issues. I feel if there was a section titled issues consent issues could be included, but because this is by itself with no earlier introduction or tie to the rest of the sections it is not relevant to the article topic. This article did not seem to be biased and remained neutral throughout the entire article. The resources are also neutral. Suggestions for this article would be fixing the website resources and developing more on the issues during the development of medical photography. I would also add a section of medical photography today. That way readers know how medical photography came to be and how it has developed today. Duffmack (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Mackenzie Duff