Talk:Medical use of MDMA

Density of citations per every unit or so of data, gives it credibilit

This article does a really good job of presenting a lot of information very clearly and in a way that is easy to understand. The sections that it is split up into really made it easy for me to understand the importance and relevance of all of the information included, and even though I didn't have any prior knowledge on this topic I feel like this article was able to teach me a lot. I also like how you're planning on adding a section on further research that needs to be done, and think it will be a good way to end the article. What I might suggest is in the last few sections consider possibly splitting the information up into different subsections more like you did in the first section on cognition. One possibly example is in the MDMA on the body's mobility section, making the part about the 29 man with Parkinson's symptoms its own subsection. I think that the most important thing that you can do to improve this article is just continuing to add more subsections just to make it easier for readers to process all of the information. Lastly, I really like the way that you present your facts with a lot of neutrality. In my article I could try more to not insert my opinions, but just present and explain the information. Kaitling (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)