Talk:Medicinal tea

Problems
There's so little verified information in this article, and the topic is redundant with other Wikipedia articles, that I think it may be better if this was redirected and merged into Herbalism, a more developed article on a similar topic. No offense to those that worked on this, but the article is currently full of original research which is prohibited. Or it could be rewritten with good research, but Wikipedia needs to focus on the core policies of WP:NOR and Verifiability in order to have any impact. - Taxman Talk 22:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The whole thing is (are?) bollocks.

Not just bollocks, this is all utterly enormous five foot wide swinging brass bollocks on huge ropes. It discredits wikipedia. Delete!


 * Well I've decided to be bold and redirect the article to herbalism. If someone wants to do some actual research on tea as a specific form of herbalism, they can turn the redirect into an actual article. What was here, was useless. - Taxman Talk 15:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)