Talk:Medieval: Total War/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Lets start with a preliminary review. The article is in decent shape and most of the essential information seems to be here, but there's quick a lot of prose and manual of style faults to deal with before it can be passed. To save time and to smooth the process, I'm going to copyedit the article myself to deal with these problems rather than listing them here; that will get the bulk of the problems out of the way. However, there are some other problems revolving around comprehensiveness, images, etc that still need to be addressed, though these shouldn't present too much of a problem. I'll get back to these when I put together a full review after copyediting. -- Sabre (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks for doing that, I probably should of requested someone else to copyedit the article before nominating it, considering I re-wrote most of it myself. QueenCake (talk) 21:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I think there should be references for the release dates in the lead.  It Is Me Here   t / c 20:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression cites were not needed in the lead. QueenCake (talk) 21:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Aye, introductions and infoboxes should have as few references as possible; as its a summary, what's in it should be sourced in the rest of the article. The release dates are referenced in the development section, so there's no need to reference it again. -- Sabre (talk) 22:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)