Talk:Mega Man: Dr. Wily's Revenge/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MuZemike (talk · contribs) 20:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Looks pretty good so far, but there are a few issues before I pass this:


 * In a 2007 retrospective of the Mega Man franchise, 1UP.com writer Jeremy Parish found the use of rehashed details acceptable for its original release, but that Dr. Wily's Revenge "hasn't really held up". → I think there is a missing verb there after "but"; it seems like something is missing there.
 * ✅ Added verb "thought". &mdash; Hibana (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * He furthermore observed the difficulty to be compounded by a lack of helpful Energy Tanks introduced in the NES Mega Man sequels. → I think an active voice would make the sentence sound a little better there.
 * ✅ &mdash; Hibana (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Some of your dates in the citations are written out, while others are YYYY-MM-DD. Please stick to one consistent format throughout the article.
 * ✅ &mdash; Hibana (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * In your print citations, you include the location of publication (such as in Nintendo Power) while you don't in others. While I won't be as finicky in a GAN (anything above GA I would require locations), but be consistent and either include them in all of them or in none of them.
 * ✅ &mdash; Hibana (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * What makes Aussie-Nintendo.com a reliable source?
 * ✅ Removed the source. &mdash; Hibana (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

On hold pending improvements to the issues above. –MuZemike 20:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Nice work. Passed. –MuZemike 21:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)