Talk:Mega Man & Bass/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 22:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria It's been up for GAN for over 60 days, so let's review
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Are you sure it's supposed to read Super Nintendo when it was only released on the Super Famicom in Japan?
 * ✅ &mdash; Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Does Japan, North America and CDs really need to be wikilinked?
 * ✅ &mdash; Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * I think the retrieval date format needs to be the same as the publishing date format
 * ✅ &mdash; Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Looks alright
 * C. No original research:
 * Looks okay
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Looks fine
 * B. Focused:
 * Looks good
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * no problems here
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * no issues here
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Looks nice
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Looks great
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * the retrieval date format is my only major concern; I'm giving you a week, but it shoudln't take long it's a pass