Talk:Megala Erga

Quality rating + layout issue
Since 2012 this article has been rated as a "Stub". Yes, it is short, and the "Contents" overview is awkwardly placed after the main section of text. Still, I would say this is a good, fully sufficient article, considering that it deals with a (lost) literary work which we know close to nothing about, and considering the volume of extant text fragments (just a few verses).

Currently, the text after the citation (starting with "Other fragments ...") is placed awkwardly in what looks like a third table column. It should rather start below the bilingual citation, thus forming a new paragraph. Unfortunately, I do not know how to fix this layout issue. Inserting a line break (blank line) does not help. -- Martinus KE (talk) 09:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)