Talk:Megastructure (planning concept)

Largest?
Such boasts need to be verified if they are to stated as facts on Wikipedia pages... Place Bonaventure was not the largest even at the time of its completion, not even for buildings of its kind and use. With 372,000 m2 of floor space, Chicago's Merchandise Mart opened in 1930 litterally dwarfs Place Bonaventure. A couple of Wiki pages need to be corrected... 70.29.247.24 (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Missing citations?
A lot of the claims are unsubstantiated, I think it would behoove you to cut down stuff that you didn't get from a source so there isn't any inaccuracy. Also were those sources the only ones you could find? A lot of them seem to be by the same people. AdamTski (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 30 May 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved to Megastructure (planning concept) - there appears to be a consensus that this title is at the very least preferable to the current one. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 11:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Megastructures (architecture) → ? – It's clear that the current name is unsuitable for the article, since Megastructure is also a type of architecture and it goes against WP:PLURAL. However, it's somewhat unclear what the new name should be, or even if the article should be merged with megaproject or arcology. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 13:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment It seems to me that this article is more related to urban planning than architecture? Not an expert in this field, so I stand to be corrected. 162 etc. (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. How about Megastructure (planning concept)? -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * do either of you have opposition to 's suggestion? Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 17:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * No objection. Like I said, I am not well informed on this subject.  I do see, however, that the article has few incoming links (some of which are seemingly intended for Megastructure.) It is also associated with only two categories, and Category:Megastructures, again, seems to be concerned with Megastructure, not this.  The whole thing probably needs attention from an expert, but that's not me. 162 etc. (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.